Discipline

Breaking the trading plan on forex

«I know what to do and I break it anyway» is the most common complaint of a trader with more than six months' experience. Breaking the trading plan on forex is usually explained by weak motivation, and that explanation is almost always wrong. Of six typical causes motivation is only one, and the rarest.

Why a trader breaks their own rules on forex: six reasons

Before working on yourself it is worth checking whether the rule itself is workable. In half the cases the question closes at this step.

01The rule is unworkable as worded

«Enter only on quality setups», «do not trade in a bad state». Compliance cannot be checked, which means it formally cannot be broken either — the rule simply does not work.

cured by rewriting
02The rule is not yours

Taken from a course or from an acquaintance and not matched to your time, deposit or temperament. Especially often — a requirement to sit at the chart for six hours, given to somebody with a job.

cured by adaptation
03The rule contradicts another rule

«Do not miss setups» and «a maximum of three trades a day» are incompatible on an active day. In a conflict the one closer to desire wins.

cured by priority
04The price of a violation is invisible

One increased lot looks like a trifle. While a violation has no sum attached, there are no arguments against it — and it is exactly that which the site's calculators compute.

cured by calculation
05There is no resource at the moment of execution

The rule demands effort exactly when no effort is left. The one cause where work on yourself is genuinely needed — and even that is solved by a mechanism rather than by motivation.

cured by a mechanism
06The rule has never been tested

It is written down but there are no statistics for it: it is unknown how many times it fired and how those cases ended. Following a rule for which you have not a single observation of your own is the hardest — it feels like somebody else's.

cured by measurement

How to check your rule in two minutes

QuestionIf the answer is «no»
Can compliance be checked from the chart and the statement?The rule is not formulated — rewrite it in verifiable form
Is it workable within your real schedule?The rule is somebody else's — adapt it to your own time
Does it conflict with another rule?Set a priority: which of the two comes first
Do you know the price of breaking it in money?Calculate it — without a figure a rule remains a wish
Does it fire without your participation?Turn it into a mechanism: an order, a limit, a closed terminal

Five «yes» answers in a row mean the rule is workable and the issue really is execution. In practice fewer than half of rules reach the fifth question.

Why motivation has almost nothing to do with it

Motivation is a resource with a daily cycle: high in the morning and after inspiring material, low in the evening and after a loss. Building rule-following on it is the same as planning a budget on the income of your best month.

execution = (motivation + ease of the action) − resistance
it is more reliable to increase ease and reduce resistance than to raise the first term

What this means in practice

Reduce the number of decisions
The stop as an order, size by formula, the entry as a pending order. Every decision removed is one less point of failure.
Reduce the effort required
A journal of five fields instead of fifteen. A checklist of seven points instead of twenty.
Increase the effort required to break it
Logging out of the terminal, the password in a manager, the laptop in a bag. Thirty seconds of barrier remove most of the impulse.
Make the price visible
One figure next to the monitor: what this habit cost last month. Calculated from the journal.

How to rewrite an unworkable rule: six examples

The most common case is a rule that cannot be broken because it cannot be checked. Below are six «before and after» wordings; rewriting takes an evening and closes half the questions about discipline.

Six rules before and after rewriting. There is one sign of a good wording: compliance can be checked from the chart or the statement without asking the author.
WasWhy it does not workBecame
«I only trade quality setups»Quality is judged at the moment of entry, that is, under the influence of a state«Enter when all four conditions from the list are met»
«Risk is reasonable»There is no number — size is chosen by a feeling of sufficiency«Risk 1 % of equity, size = risk ÷ (stop × point value)»
«I do not trade when tired»Fatigue is not recognised from the inside precisely when it is present«I do not trade on less than 6 hours' sleep or after 3 hours at the chart»
«I do not chase losses»Describes an intention rather than an action, and so cannot be checked«After two stops in a row the terminal is closed until tomorrow»
«I exit when the move has run out of steam»There is no exit condition, so the exit will be by emotion«Half at 1R, stop to the entry point, the rest to level N»
«I keep a journal»There is neither a volume, nor a deadline, nor a criterion of completeness«Nine columns, filled in on the day of the trade, reviewed on Saturdays»
a rule is workable if three conditions hold:
it can be checked from the statement · it can be broken · it requires no judgement at the moment of the trade

What to do when the rule is right but there is no execution

One case in six is left: the wording is checkable, the rule is yours, there are no conflicts, the price is known — and it still is not followed. Here what works is not motivation but a change in the effort required.

01Remove the decision

The stop as an order, size by formula, the entry as a pending order. Every decision removed is one less point of failure.

the strongest
02Reduce the effort of following it

A journal of nine columns instead of twenty, a checklist of eight points instead of thirty. A short one gets done, a long one does not.

strong
03Increase the effort required to break it

Logging out of the terminal, the password in a manager, the laptop in a bag. A thirty-second barrier removes most of the impulse.

strong
04Make the price visible

One figure next to the monitor: what this habit cost last month. Calculated from the journal.

medium
05Add an outside observer

A weekly report to another person. It works for months, so it is suitable for establishing a habit rather than as a permanent mechanism.

medium
06Narrow the field of decisions

Two pairs instead of ten, one setup instead of four, one window instead of the whole day. Less input data means fewer occasions to interpret it in your own favour.

structural

The order in the list is by descending reliability, not by popularity. The first three ask nothing of you at the moment of the trade, and that is exactly why they work on the evening when everything else has already stopped working.

Frequently asked questions

Why do I break the rules even though I understand the point of them?

Because understanding and execution are provided by different things. Understanding is knowledge; execution is the resource available in the moment plus the ease of the action. That is exactly why reading another book about discipline does not change behaviour, while a placed order changes it at once.

Maybe trading is simply not for me?

The question is premature until the six reasons above have been checked. If after rewriting the rules and introducing mechanisms the rule-following share does not grow for three months — then it is a reasonable question, and the answer may be anything.

Does telling someone about your rules help?

It helps as an external barrier: an obligation to another person is met better than one to yourself. But the effect lasts months rather than years, and it is worth using to establish a habit rather than as a permanent mechanism.

What if I only break down during a drawdown?

That is the most common profile. What works is a pair: reduced size after a set depth of drawdown plus a hard stop-day. Both rules must switch on automatically rather than by decision — during a drawdown decisions are made at their worst.

DiagramFive questions for a rule that is not followed
Five questions for a rule that is not followed: is it checkable in the report, is it feasible in a real schedule, does it conflict with another rule, is the price of breaking it known in money and does it fire without your involvement
APTF logo
APTF editorial teamWe examine trading psychology where it shows up in the statement: the price of one broken plan, the probability of a run of stops, the cost of revenge trading and of overtrading. We give the formulas in full so that every calculation can be repeated in your own spreadsheet.Who writes and how we verify the dataData verified: